Search for: "eBay (UK) Limited" Results 1 - 20 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 9:13 am by Eric Goldman
Although Rosen’s 512(h) subpoenas are generally enforceable, the court limits their scope. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:56 am by Milen Hristov
Remember that Ebay has a limit for uploading photos, so normally sellers upload about 2-3 photos. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 The only evidence was a communication from one internet retailer indicating that it wouldn’t ship the product because it had been warned by its supplier, presumably JHS, to limit sales to specific countries. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited has now been posted on the Curia website. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited (see Part I for background, Part II for the ruling and an easy summary). [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:10 am by Marty Schwimmer
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited has been posted on the Court’s website. [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 12:00 am
  In the European Union a consistent line of CJEU decisions including L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited Case C-324/09 (IPKat posts here, here and here), means that can usually be determined by analysis of whether or not the average consumer of the goods or services… [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 3:37 am
324/09 L’Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie, Laboratoire Garnier & Cie, L’Oréal (UK) Limited v eBay International AG, eBay Europe SARL and eBay (UK) Limited Advocate General Jääskinen delivered his keenly awaited opinion. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
Pumfrey J has previously said (in Quads 4 Kids v Campbell [2006] EWHC 2482 (Ch)) that a Vero notice is "a clear arguable threat" and granted an interim injunction on this basis.More recently, (in Cassie Creations v Blackmore and Mirrorkool [2014] EWHC2941 (Ch) and T&A Textiles and Hosiery Limited v Hala Textile UK Limited[2015] EWHC 2888) it was suggested that arguing that an eBay Vero notice may be a threat is persuasive. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:03 am by Theo Francis
Our insurance policies carry low coverage limits, which may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:15 am
The law has been recently considered by the Supreme Court in Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Limited [2015] UKSC 10; [2015] AC 1229, which I sought to summarise in Vertical Leisure Limited v Poleplus Limited [2015] EWHC 841 (IPEC). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
One of the main examples given is eBay, which uses ODR to resolve 60 million disputes a year among traders. [read post]
This will probably not stop the floodgate of such orders being sought in the UK, not just to prevent streaming of unlawful music, television, film, sports coverage or gaming content, but also the sale of counterfeit and infringing branded products through online marketplaces (such as Amazon, eBay or others). [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 8:30 am by Andy
The case was T & A Textiles v Hala Texile UK Ltd and others, and it was heard before Mr Douglas Campbell sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:35 am
  For example, final injunctions are not granted uniformly, even in common law jurisdictions where they are understood to be equitable remedies: in the UK, the position is that the successful claimant is generally regarded as entitled to an injunction (Vestergaard); in the US, by contrast, that is no longer the case following eBay v MercExchange. [read post]